|
Just
in Case…
In
the 1931 case of Gibson v. Commonwealth, the Kentucky Court
of Appeals summarized Kentucky jurisprudence on self-defense in a
very definitive, and somewhat emphatic, manner. "It is the
tradition that a Kentuckian never runs. He does not have to…he is
not obligated to retreat, nor to consider whether he can safely
retreat, but is entitled to stand his ground, and meet any
(life-threatening) attack made upon him with a deadly
weapon…." Gibson v. Commonwealth, 34 SW 936 (Ky.
1931).
There
is no doubt that this maxim of legal thought still holds sway today
in the Kentucky courts. Individuals who employ deadly force to
protect their lives will generally receive favorable treatment from
the Kentucky courts. However, after an individual employs
self-defense, there is always the opportunity for that person to
catch the dreaded, and sometimes fatal, disease known as "foot
in mouth". This can almost certainly make a bad situation much
worse.
If
a CCDW Permit holder finds himself having just survived a shooting
encounter with an armed attacker, he should keep several very
important points in mind. First, stress to the investigating
officers that you "feared for your life". This assertion
helps to ensure that you meet the basic requirements under
Kentucky’s law for self-defense. Prosecutors tend to rely heavily
upon the initial impressions of police officers at the scene of a
shooting. If a person is believed to have genuinely feared for his
life, the prosecutor’s office is unlikely to pursue any
prosecution against the victim. If, on the other hand, a person
begins to recite dialogue from a Clint Eastwood movie, police may
become suspicious and begin to make the victim, rather than the
assailant, the target of the investigation.
Keep
your remarks short and to the point when speaking to the police.
Provide them with the Joe Friday "just the facts" line of
information. Sometimes when a witness elaborates on aspects not in
evidence he may hurt his own case. Do not tell the police about past
"war stories" or how you have been "preparing for a
day like this". Such dialogue only serves to make a generally
sympathetic police officer more suspicious of your motives. Stick to
the straight facts of the situation.
Finally,
avoid talking to the media unless you feel comfortable in guarding
yourself against incriminating remarks. Many times media
representatives may be seeking to apply a certain "bent"
to your story by putting words in your mouth. Television cameras, in
particular, are attracted to the sensational. The image of the gun
slinging cowboy, while certainly not a negative image in most
people’s minds, can be manipulated by unscrupulous sources in the
media to work against your case. Reporters will often attempt to
portray individuals who carry concealed firearms for self-protection
as acting out their boyhood John Wayne fantasies. If you find
yourself falling into such a media trap, simply refer the reporters
to KC3 media chairman Kraig Keller. Kraig can field questions in a
safe way so as not to endanger your case.
The
vast majority of citizens who are CCDW permit holders will never
have the occasion to use their weapons in a violent confrontation.
However, for the few who do, it is important to know how to react
once the shooting is over. Use your own common sense as well as the
points mentioned above and things should work out just fine.
Remember, most law enforcement as well as the vast majority of the
public are on your side. Don’t turn these groups against your case
by making ill-timed remarks. Sometimes the most difficult obstacles
to overcome are the ones encountered after you re-holster your
weapon.
J.
Scott Kappas, Esq.
Attorney
at law |